Tweets and comments (disable) |
1 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago omfg first!!!! |
2 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago what is this FIRST fag? |
3 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago third!!! hihihi |
4 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago The hypotenuse is bent a bit. Inward in the upper and outward in the under. This is enough to make
that hole. |
5 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago 4 you have bad eye sight! |
6 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago #5 is blind |
7 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago omg, how many of you degenerated idiots have to fall for this before it stops.... |
8 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago If you count, dy/dx for the blue triangle is 7/3, wich is not equal to the dy/dx for the red one,
wich is 9/4. Just to help clarify what #4 said. |
9 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago Correct, which means that even though the length and height of both figures are the same, the second
one still occupies slightly more surface which has to be compensated |
10 | | Anonymous,161 weeks ago AAAAHHH MAH GHAAAUUD MAH EEEYEES! |
11 | | Anononmynus,161 weeks ago wow, im stoned and it took me at least 10 mins to understand it, i think we've done that in 7th
grade |
12 | | Hershel Layton,161 weeks ago This one reminds me of a puzzle. |
13 | | Luke Triton,161 weeks ago But Professor, that's not a puzzle! That's a mindfuck! |
14 | | Anonymous,160 weeks ago wheres ur god now? |
15 | | Anonymous,160 weeks ago angles on the 2 triangles are slightly different in the middle, there for the triangle area seems
smaller then it actually is.... [troll neutralized] |
16 | | Anonymous,159 weeks ago YES IM MAD, I CALCULATE ALL AREAS AND TRYING TO PROVE THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!!! |
17 | | Anonymous,159 weeks ago im mad (#16 a.k.a. Dr. Kom who knows everything) the size of the top triangle is 56 and the lower is
55... but its fake they both are 55.5 ill tell u now how |
18 | | Dr. Kom,159 weeks ago the size of the blue triangle is 10.5 (which confuses everytning) of the red is 18, of the yellow
part its 15 and the green is 12. overal 55.5 - the angles of the 2 tirangles (red and blue) are
different. if you look carefully the topper triangle is sligh |
19 | | Anonymous,158 weeks ago Im cheesecake! |
20 | | Anonymous,158 weeks ago what? you all seriously dont get it? the yellow one it one step higher up on second picture..
really.. yall so stupid?? |
21 | | Anonymous,156 weeks ago it is because the blue triangle is curved |
22 | | Anonymous,152 weeks ago #20 are you fucking retarded, do you really think thats the issue? go kill yourself |
23 | | Anonymous,136 weeks ago he just switchd place on red and blue? |
24 | | Anonymous,135 weeks ago *multiple-facepalm* like many of these guys said, the hypotenuse is a bit bent, not visible for the
naked eye. If u look on the corner of one triangle, and match it up with the other, u'll se that
they don't match |
25 | | Anonymous,116 weeks ago The angles are different, therefore the last triangle manages to spare one block. |
26 | | Anonymous,111 weeks ago Mind - BLOWN |
27 | | Lillasyster,109 weeks ago I see what u did there |
| |
|